Page 1 of 4

Honest opinions on my chassis-work please...

Posted: Fri Oct 03, 08 6:09 pm
by db
I've been fabricating brackets to attach the front mounts for my 4-link, i've tried to judge where the forces will be applied and put metal in the necessary places. It's all square and straight and parallel within a millimetre or so.

What do ya reckon- will it twist/ tear off/ foul-up the handling or work ok?
Is it over/ under- engineered?
Is it damn ugly or does it fit in with the lines of the existing chassis rails?

Be honest- i can take it :help:

oh.... yes i know i'll need to bash the floorpans a bit more :working:

Posted: Fri Oct 03, 08 9:23 pm
by Anonymous
Unless you have diagonal bars linking the corners of the car you are always going to have chassis twist. I would bet that is going to be a lot stiffer than the original setup though.

Posted: Fri Oct 03, 08 9:31 pm
by JohnR
Agree you need a panhard type rod to stop axle moving side to side adjustable one would be better than fixed type

Posted: Fri Oct 03, 08 10:11 pm
by Anonymous
Nice work DB.

:thumbright: :thumbright:

Posted: Fri Oct 03, 08 10:36 pm
by TrevD
i agree , you do need some form of lateral location to stop side to side movement, most comon is a single diagonal link on the lower arm, you could go for a sliding locator (like the big boys run ) or a watts linkage (like some astons run) or a panard rod (the easy way) whatever you do do something. apart from that it looks like a super job, you can put too much strength in a street car suspension but many people dont put enough. too much is better than not enough :thumbright:

Posted: Sat Oct 04, 08 1:01 pm
by db
Thanks chaps, guess what todays job is :D

Posted: Sat Oct 04, 08 1:16 pm
by Anonymous
:thumbright:



Nice rocking horse :lol:


.

Posted: Sat Oct 04, 08 1:28 pm
by db
Bratfink wrote:Unless you have diagonal bars linking the corners of the car you are always going to have chassis twist. I would bet that is going to be a lot stiffer than the original setup though.
I have a cage which is goes thru to the frame rails, should do the trick?

Posted: Sat Oct 04, 08 1:43 pm
by db
33 Plymouth wrote::thumbright:



Nice rocking horse :lol:


.
Gettin a bit threadbare now- luckily i've grown too big for it anyway ;)

Posted: Sat Oct 04, 08 4:28 pm
by db
YAAY :D
Panhard rod installed, shock mounts and anti-roll bar next :thumbright:

Posted: Sat Oct 04, 08 7:35 pm
by db
WHY DID I GET AN ANTI-ROLL BAR :scratch:

Now i've installed the 4-link & Panhard, i can't see how the car can possibly roll on the axle cos the 4-link holds the 2 parallel (ish), i can't see any possible need for the a.r.b. :?

SECOND PROBLEM- i forgot to check Panhard clearance on full axle travel and they collide :oops:
DO I - Bend the Panhard (with a proper pipe-bender) in line with travel so the rod ends don't get out of line.
OR - redrill the chassis mount and extend the axle mount to raise the Rod higher.

Posted: Sat Oct 04, 08 8:44 pm
by Philth
Great work db! Fancy fitting me frame connectors??? ;) God, I'm a lazy get!

Bend the panhard - job done! Also, I would have thought radius arms would have done the job, too.

I'm a bit suspicious of panhard rods. OK for cars with tight suspension with little movement (Caterams?) but I would have thought that the arc they travel through when getting angry with the car would cause a bit of side-to-side wobble???

Hell, what do I know - I'm drinking beer!!! :pub: :drunken: :blah:

Posted: Sat Oct 04, 08 11:05 pm
by db
Cheers Philth!
I figured bending the rod would be ok but it's the sort o thing you want a 2nd opinion on ;)
It's pretty much a mild pro-street car with 18" rear MT's and skinny fronts under an all steel B bod-- i don't think i'll be gettin angry round any corners! Not on purpose anyhow :shock:

Posted: Sat Oct 04, 08 11:22 pm
by Ian Z
P, can you re-bracket the panhard to the inside of the frame section rather than underside?