I have done loads of these, and still managed to crush one of the shells using a 10 ton press when it went off-centre
More LCA - Hotchkis problem ?
Moderator: Moderators
In terms of Root cause - either the Pins are too long (incorrect part), or (more likely) the Inner or outer Bush shells have creased and are preventing either the outer bush shell fully entering the LCA, or preventing the pin fully entering the inner bush.
I have done loads of these, and still managed to crush one of the shells using a 10 ton press when it went off-centre

I have done loads of these, and still managed to crush one of the shells using a 10 ton press when it went off-centre
Pete Wiseman; Cambridge.
Mopar by the grace of God
Mopar by the grace of God
- Adrian Worman
- Posts: 4376
- Joined: Mon Aug 02, 10 1:23 pm
- Location: Milton Keynes
morgan wrote:
Not sure what stops your LCAs moving forward though ? Must be the shaft butts right up to the torsion bar
The lca is positively located for fore and aft by the strut rod that attaches to the front of the K member, but you're right tho mate, the t bar does go some way in helping to stop it moving, having said that Ii never had a poly bush fail, squeak, move, whatever, .................... still recommend top quality polygrahite components if you're using aftermarket hi perf suspension components
Jesus built my hot rod
72 Challenger
65 Barracuda
72 Challenger
65 Barracuda
- Dave-R
- Posts: 24752
- Joined: Sun Apr 18, 04 11:23 pm
- Location: Dave Robson lives in Geordieland
- Contact:
You just got in before me there Ade.
The key to controling the LCA is the bush for the strut rod. Using a poly bush is essensial there. Some would say an adjustable strut rod is even better at the job. Because you can load the LCA forwards which not only stop the LCA from slipping back, but also adds a bit of positive caster.
The key to controling the LCA is the bush for the strut rod. Using a poly bush is essensial there. Some would say an adjustable strut rod is even better at the job. Because you can load the LCA forwards which not only stop the LCA from slipping back, but also adds a bit of positive caster.
-
DaveBishop
- Posts: 1667
- Joined: Sun Apr 18, 04 11:22 pm
- Location: Alicante Spain
-
DaveBishop
- Posts: 1667
- Joined: Sun Apr 18, 04 11:22 pm
- Location: Alicante Spain
This gets odder and odder.
Closer investigation shows that the shell for the bush (poly come in 2 bits) does NOT seat to the base of the LCA. There is a 3mm or so gap. (as can sort of be seen in pic A). This accounts for some of it.
However, pic B) shows the top of the shell - and its flush pretty much (maye 1mm in it). Can only conclude that either a) The shell doesn't go to the base or b) the shell edge has been flattened by the press and shouldn't be flat topped like that, should be just in the LCA.
But check pic C). Oddest of all. Pic looks out of alignment, on the bench they were not. Number of things to see -
1) Hotchkis pivot shorter by 3or 4mm.
2) poly bush is WAY longer than the pivot, and also longer than old. Assuming old was flush to torsion bar (or close enough) then there is no way that poly bush (at current length) would seat the pivot at the same point. Show as the diff between a) and c) in diagram.
This is really odd. I can get the length right by cutting off the muffin-top (or trimming it down) allowing pivot to seat further into the uca - but I shouldn't have to. It should be the right length???
Shells out, shopping basket open, start over I reckon at this stage.
Closer investigation shows that the shell for the bush (poly come in 2 bits) does NOT seat to the base of the LCA. There is a 3mm or so gap. (as can sort of be seen in pic A). This accounts for some of it.
However, pic B) shows the top of the shell - and its flush pretty much (maye 1mm in it). Can only conclude that either a) The shell doesn't go to the base or b) the shell edge has been flattened by the press and shouldn't be flat topped like that, should be just in the LCA.
But check pic C). Oddest of all. Pic looks out of alignment, on the bench they were not. Number of things to see -
1) Hotchkis pivot shorter by 3or 4mm.
2) poly bush is WAY longer than the pivot, and also longer than old. Assuming old was flush to torsion bar (or close enough) then there is no way that poly bush (at current length) would seat the pivot at the same point. Show as the diff between a) and c) in diagram.
This is really odd. I can get the length right by cutting off the muffin-top (or trimming it down) allowing pivot to seat further into the uca - but I shouldn't have to. It should be the right length???
Shells out, shopping basket open, start over I reckon at this stage.
- Attachments
-
- wtf ?!?!?
- odder1.jpg (174.75 KiB) Viewed 923 times
-
- PIC B
- bush_top.jpg (137.4 KiB) Viewed 923 times
-
- PIC A
- bush_bottom.jpg (74.98 KiB) Viewed 923 times
"Cum homine de cane debeo congredi." Woof.
Current Charger status - "Working and awesome"
Current Charger status - "Working and awesome"
Update -
Sorted. Brutal surgery, but alignment now good and all tight.
Long story short, had to shave ~1mm from the bottom of the bush, 5mm off the top allowing the pivot to seat to the same level as the original.
Bush is still contained all the way down, neck still rests on the top of the sleeve.
All now fits. Diagonal strut tight on new bushes. Torsion bars properly seated (complete with safety clip at tail end). Geometry looks like it should.
Still don't know why so odd - but hey, all good now.
Special nod to Pete - your pictures were more useful than you know - once I understood what needed to rest on what and which bits didn't matter as force held them anyway I was good. Anyway, in what I hope to be the conclusion of this, and just so the archive record is complete for future bodgers, here is the proof in pudding.
Thankyouverymuch. uh-huh-huh...
Sorted. Brutal surgery, but alignment now good and all tight.
Long story short, had to shave ~1mm from the bottom of the bush, 5mm off the top allowing the pivot to seat to the same level as the original.
Bush is still contained all the way down, neck still rests on the top of the sleeve.
All now fits. Diagonal strut tight on new bushes. Torsion bars properly seated (complete with safety clip at tail end). Geometry looks like it should.
Still don't know why so odd - but hey, all good now.
Special nod to Pete - your pictures were more useful than you know - once I understood what needed to rest on what and which bits didn't matter as force held them anyway I was good. Anyway, in what I hope to be the conclusion of this, and just so the archive record is complete for future bodgers, here is the proof in pudding.
Thankyouverymuch. uh-huh-huh...
- Attachments
-
- ta-do (sorry on zoom - cant really see the bush bit)
- fitted.jpg (197.65 KiB) Viewed 888 times
-
- compare to show the shaved bits.
- shaved.jpg (79.5 KiB) Viewed 888 times
"Cum homine de cane debeo congredi." Woof.
Current Charger status - "Working and awesome"
Current Charger status - "Working and awesome"